Subject to the other conditions of this sub-licensing The Linux Foundation hereafter grants a worldwide license to the sublicensing and sub-licensee. non-exclusive, indeterminate, non-transferable sub-license for the use of the sublicensing and good interiority in the form on the authorization statement (for example. B “authorized use”) in relation to authorized goods/services that are indicated in the authorization to use, produced by or on behalf of the sublicensing (if authorized products are permitted) or (authorized services). CONSIDERING that the Linux Foundation was created by Mr. Torvalds for the explicit purpose of possessing and exercising the exclusive right (a) to sublicate the use of the trademark and value to individuals and corporations in order to protect the right of those responsible to use the trademark in relation to authorized goods or services (as defined here) and (b) to act on behalf of the Linux community; and neither the Linux Foundation nor Mr. Torvalds accepts that the Linux Foundation will not grant additional licenses to another sublicensing for the use of the trademark in a manner similar to or similar to the sublicensing mark, nor does the Linux Foundation or Mr. Torvalds have an obligation to make reasonable or other efforts to determine whether a sublicensing similar or equal to the sublicensing has been granted. In addition, neither the Linux Foundation nor Mr. Torvalds is required to mediate, resolve or otherwise involve in disputes with the sublicensing mark, including, but not limited to, litigation involving potentially conflicting uses. The sublicensing holder undertakes to exempt and compensate the Linux Foundation and Mr. Torvalds from all claims and costs arising from such disputes related to the sublicensing related to that sublicensing or the sublicensing mark, whether between the sublicensors and other sublicensors, or between sublicens and others claiming rights to the trademark or sub-license worldwide.
If the licensee is to have changes or improvements to the IP granted or to the data collected/generated, the licensee should be required to obtain the transfer of these rights from a sublicensed in question. The licensee is responsible for the activities of the sublicensing. You should consult a qualified lawyer in the relevant jurisdiction on the licensing agreement and seek advice. The above interpretation is very helpful. However, I have another question that is listed below: Is the sublicensing of real estate allowed if the licensee authorizes it. If so, should the licensee also be a party to this agreement or should his letter of agreement simply be attached to that agreement? If the sub-licensing contract is not available in English, the taker provides the donor with a precise English translation in addition to a copy of the original agreement. In this context, we highlight the reflections on the establishment of sublicensing rules in the context of an intellectual property license. The sublicensing holder accepts that neither the Linux Foundation nor Mr. Torvalds are responsible or rule on rules, regulations, laws or other restrictions or conditions regarding the use of the sublicensing mark in a jurisdiction. The underlicensed has no recourse against the Linux Foundation or Mr. Torvalds if, for whatever reason, the sublicensor cannot use the trademark or sublicensing mark in connection with the authorized use in a (s) territory (s). Note: “To avoid any doubt, end-users are not allowed to modify, distribute or sublicensing covered products (or embedded or integrated licensed technologies) and the policyholder ensures that each end user is informed in writing of all applicable restrictions.” A sublicensing contract is an agreement by which the taker (as a sublicensing donor) grants certain rights of the licensee to another person (as a sublicensing).